Aunque es un poco largo, y está en inglés, incluyo un post del blog Get Energy Smart Now, que me ha gustado mucho.
My name is … and I’m a Petro-holic
November 13th, 2008
My name is X and I am a Petro-Holic, a Carbo-Holic. My last fillup was 9 gallons three days ago. My last plane flight was 24 hours ago for 2500 miles. And, my last light switch turning on was 2 hours ago. My name is X and I am a Petro-Holic.
My name is X and I am Energy Illiterate. I cannot stand here and tell you the power measurement difference between a BtU and a KwH, the difference between Appalachian coal and Wyoming coal, or the carbon footprint of the newspaper that I read this morning. Even though I have been spending most of productive hours on energy issues for the past four years, my name is X and I am Energy Illiterate.
My name is X and I suffer from Short-Termitis. Like most Americans, I believe in Benjamin Franklin: A penny saved is a penny earned. When I go to fulfill my shopping needs, my eyes gravitate to the “bargain” of 99 cents. When I see an incandescent bulb for 25 cents sitting next to a compact fluorescent bulb for two dollars & 50 cents, even though I know better, my natural inclination is to grab that incandescent
which “costs” ninety percent less. That is, it costs less to buy even though it costs far more to own. My name is X and I suffer from Short-Termitis.
My name is X and I am afflicted with Stove-Pipeitis. My emotions can rise to enthusiasm
when faced with a great new solar product, a vision for electrifying all personal vehicles
being executed by Better Place, or a concept for algae-based fuel. My time can be caught up working with one set of problems within one organization, even as the challenge is multi-faceted and multi- organizational. My name is X and I am afflicted with Stove-Pipeitis.
I’m X. I am afflicted but I am not alone. 300 millon Americans share my affiliations.
You … I … We face a very serious challenge. In fact, just that is indicative of the problem
as we do not face a challenge but an interacting set of challenges.
We are facing a Perfect Storm of, at least, the interaction of Fiscal Crisis, Peak Oil, and Catastrophic Climate Change. We can find solutions to each of these but “the” solution to one might aggravate or inhibit solving others. We must work to find a systems-of-systems solution set that will help us, all of the US and all of us around the globe, navigate this Perfect Storm to a Prosperous, Climate-Friendly Society.
The risks and implications of the financial, energy, and climate change perfect storm almost cannot be overstated.
To deal with this set of challenges, we must transform our energy system and that doesn’t mean “Drill, Baby, Drill“.
To deal with this set of challenges, we must determine a path toward functional energy literacy for all American decision-makers on energy issues – which means all of us.
To deal with this set of challenges, we must find a path to change human nature from discounting the future in favor of the present and to end our borrowing from tomorrow to live today.
To deal with this set of challenges, we must find ways to move beyond stove-piped, single-point solution thinking to striving to understand systems-of-systems interactions and implications.
To deal with this set of challenges, we must change ourselves and our society.
And we must do this now. Our survival depends on it.
Almost every day, there are new revelations and data highlighting the seriousness of our situation when it comes to global finance, energy, and accelerating catastrophic climate change.
Almost every day, there are seemingly magical announcements of some form of technological Silver Bullet that, hold your breath, will solve all our problems.
Let us be clear, however, that there is no such thing as a single technological Silver Bullet
when it comes to these challenges. If we are going to navigate a path forward, it will be with a series of Silver BBs, each contributing in some way to moving us forward to a more sensible and sustainable future.
Some of these Silver BBs will be technological.
Some will be policy driven.
Some will derived from financial opportunities.
There are many paths that will provide Silver BBs.
But, we will not succeed if we do not have social change.
As you well know, social change, is not something that typically occurs overnight. Consider this, we are about to have a black man go into the Oval Office.
And, not as a butler.
Did the social change that enabled that begin with the Emancipation Proclamation? Brown versus Board of Education? Colin Powell as National Security Advisor? No matter your starting point, that change certainly did not happen right away.
And, when it comes to the social change necessary for navigating this perfect storm,
we are speaking of a societal change easily of the same degrees of complexity and, in many ways, much more difficult.
And, the dismaying financial turmoil and the terrifying realities of Climate Change and implications of Peak Oil (and other peak resources) dictate that we DO NOT HAVE 150 years to make this change.
During the four years of the Bush administration, energy was not a topic that could be discussed in the halls of the Pentagon. “Energy” was OWNED by VP Cheney. It was clearly understood, when the Chief of staff of the army’s replacement was announced a year in advance. He had just spoken the truth to Congress on the numbers that would be needed in Iraq.
All of this is prelude to something to spark, I hope, a conversation as to how we can foster this social change and speed it along. Certainly, while not a welcome factor, four-dollar-a-gallon gasoline showed itself to be a motivational factor for changed behavior and increased energy literacy. For some, an Oscar-winning documentary of someone giving a slide presentation proved a motivational factor for changed behavior and increased climate impact literacy. And, a Presidential candidate, President-Elect, and President making “green jobs” and smarter energy behaviors a central point of his discussion and policies for moving the nation forward will be a motivational factor for changed behavior and spark a reduction in the nation’s energy and climate illiteracy rates.
For my part, starting almost four years ago, I have been in the nexus of a group that has sought, in our way, to help foster and hasten societal change when it comes to energy issues.
Working primarily, but far from solely, with the Department of Defense, a diverse group of government officials and screen writers, industry business developers and think tank intellectuals, energy professionals and environmental activists began a series of informal and private soiree discussions which formalized into a non-profit called The Energy Consensus. We bring in speakers and experts into our homes, striving to reduce our individual and group energy illiteracy. We strive to bring cross-discipline, inter-organizational perspectives into the discussions, seeking to find ways of interacting across traditional stove-pipes in identifying problems and potential solution paths. We have people who are working together on innovative technologies. Others striving to develop children’s books. Others fostering interacting on new ways of explaining and exploring challenges that we face.
As part of the group, we have about 150 people involved in a listserve discussion
which has, at times, had influence on government discussion. For example, one of our members, the screenwriter Nora Maccoby, had an engaging conversation with then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld at a party on Dec 14th, 2005. Rumsfeld asked her to come back to see him. That evening Rumsfeld sent his first snowflake about energy
to his Deputy and two under secretaries asking what was the Department of Defense doing about energy conSERvation and was energy in the quadrennial defense review. (A report required by congress every four years, to look into the future.)
Nora called to tell me about her invitation from the Secretary and I suggested
that we ought to figure out what she might want to say and if she wanted to take anyone with her on this call. So I sent an email to our list with the question, “if you had 15 minutes with the SecDef, what would you want to tell him about energy?”
With in 48 hours I had received a rich, diverse, and impassioned set of suggestions. When put all together, it was 15 pages single spaced.. Someone within the list, working at a high level in the Defense Department, took the suggestions and sent them out to his email list saying, “this is important. We need to do something about it.”
To show an example of how complex causalities can be, The New York Post reported that Nora’s encounter with Rumsfeld and the discussion material from our group sparked a discussion leading to the inclusion in President Bush’s 2006 State of the union speech of the words. “we have a problem, the nation is addicted to oil.” Once the President made energy a subject the rest of us could talk about, many things started to happen.
In short order a Defense Science Board on Energy Security was announced to look at energy and national security. And other things happened within the Office of the Secretary of Defense on energy policy issues that have helped moved the Department toward more sensible energy policies even under the Bush-Cheney Administration.
Beyond the Energy Consensus, is the Energy Conversation, a monthly lecture series funded by the Defense Department and now sponsored by or partnered with 26 different Federal departments and agencies. We cover the waterfront of issues with speakers like Amory Lovins, Jim Woolsey, Walmart executives, Lester Brown, Better Place, and a host of other people for engagement in a diverse discussion space of the interacting and integrated challenges of energy, water, catastrophic climate change, and otherwise. Now, we strive not to end with this as a passive lecture.
It is a Conversation.
Our motto is :
“Listen. Learn. Connect. Share. Collaborate.”
The Energy Conversation serves as a catalyst for creating a collaborative, safe space to build a networked community of Energy Smart advocates to inform, educate and communicate with each other, their families, their home institutions, with the American people on how to build a sustainable energy future.
Let me be honest, I’m a name-tag maniac. I do not think that we can overestimate the value of name tags in LARGE readable print in meeting environments for breaking the ice and facilitating discussion. Of as much, or even more value as the presentations are the conversations and connections created through the round-tables and discussions that are sparked before, during, and after the presentations.
I know that it has been a good session when there are business cards being passed
around and, when walking by groups, I hear “I am so glad that we met.” I believe that we are achieving something when I get feedback from people who say, they would never had met these folks and never had a chance to collaborate on some new project without
the environment of the Energy Conversation.
We will not navigate our way through the Perfect Storm with business as usual. Technology will provide us some Silver BBs. Financial mechanisms can assist with Silver BBs. Government Policy and better energy standards are critical for enabling and fostering Silver BBs and their implementation. Political change is critical to enabling navigating a safe path. But, we must find our way to social
and cultural change as well.
The Energy Consensus and Energy Conversation won’t solve our energy challenges,
won’t turn back the tides of Global Warming’s rising seas. They are not, somehow, a magical Silver Bullet. But efforts like these, which strive to put people together, to inform, to break stove-pipes, to create environments where innovative solutions might emerge and find paths for implementation could represent a tool for hastening necessary social and cultural changes.
But, the challenges are not to be dismissed or discounted. The risks we face in this Perfect Storm cannot be overstated.
Let me be clear,I am spending the last years of my life dedicated to helping provide solution paths rather than enjoying pina coladas at the beach. My survival is likely not at stake, but your future prospects and the prospects for my, your, our children; for my, your, our grandchildren certainly are. And, the fact is – that those prospects will be brightened if we can speed the necessary social and cultural changes.
My name is X. I am a Petro-Holic. But I know people who are helping me and others fight our addiction.
My name is X. I am Energy Illiterate. But I know people who are helping me and others achieve literacy.
My name is X. I suffer from Short-Termitis. But, people are helping me and others see the long-term and work toward it.
My name is X and I am afflicted with Stove-Pipeitis. But, people are working with me and others to make the connections and break through the pipes.
My name is X. I am a connector. And, connecting people, organizations, and institutions is my role in helping to foster and hasten the social and cultural changes that will enable us to move toward a prosperous and climate-friendly future.